home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group97b.txt
/
000116_icon-group-sender _Fri Nov 7 13:07:59 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2000-09-20
|
2KB
Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
Received: from kingfisher.CS.Arizona.EDU (kingfisher.CS.Arizona.EDU [192.12.69.239])
by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA29731
for <icon-group-addresses@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 13:07:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: by kingfisher.CS.Arizona.EDU (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/08Nov94-0446PM)
id AA03636; Fri, 7 Nov 1997 13:07:45 -0700
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 11:49:14 -0600
Message-Id: <199711071749.LAA25967@segfault.cs.utsa.edu>
From: Clinton Jeffery <jeffery@segfault.cs.utsa.edu>
To: andersh@maths.lth.se
Cc: icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
In-Reply-To: <63ut6p$icj$1@news.lth.se> (andersh@maths.lth.se)
Subject: Re: Graphics suggestion
Reply-To: jeffery@cs.utsa.edu
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
Status: RO
Brian Rogoff wrote, regarding portable graphics:
> There are Perl-Tk, Python-Tk, ML-Tk, etc. Numerous commercial and free
> products are built with Tk, and it seems fairly stable now.
Yup, Tk seems like a strong option, and there are probably several Tk users
in our community who could help build and/or test it.
Anders writes:
> What would be preferable, a straight Icon-Tk connection or a
> connection that follows the present Icon graphic conventions?
Good question! There are strong advantages to both.
A straight Icon-Tk connection would provide facilities for more flexible
user interface construction. A connection that implements our interface
would provide somewhat better support for graphics programming. Whether or
not it provided a portable straight-Tk interface, a Tk-Icon wouldn't solve
our portability goals unless it supported our graphics interface on the Mac
and maybe additional platforms.
Clint Jeffery, jeffery@cs.utsa.edu